How might Operative Dentistry be a Threat to the Pulp?
Keywords:
MedicineReferences
1. Roberson T. Sturdevant's art & science of operative dentistry. 4th ed. Sturdevant: Clifford M; 2002.
2. Morrant GA. Dental instrumentation and pulpal injury II - Clinical considerations. J Br Endo Soc. 1977; 10(2):55-63.
3. Stanley HR. Pulpal responses. In: Burns and Cohen S, editors. Pathways of the pulp. 3rd ed. St Louis Mosby; 1984. p. 465-489.
4. Wittrock JW, Morrant GA, Davies EH. A study of temperature changes during the removal of amalgam restoration. J Pros Dent. 1975; 13:21-35.
5. Bergenhotlz G. Evidence for bacterial causation of adverse pulpal responses in resin-based dental restorations. Crit Rev Oral Biology Med. 2000; 11: 467- 80.
6. Summitt J, editor. Fundamentals of operative dentistry – a contemporary approach. Chicago: Quintess Int.; 2001.
7. Brannström M. Communication between the oral cavity and the dental pulp associated with restorative treatment. Oper Dent. 1984; 9:57-68.
8. Fitzgerald M, Chiego DJ Jr, Heys DR. Auto- radiographic analysis of odontoblast replacement following pulp exposure in primate teeth. Arch Oral Biol. 1990; 35:707.
9. Brannström M, Linden LA, Johnson G. Movement of dentinal and pulpal fluid caused by clinical procedures. J Dent Rest. 1968; 47(5):679-82.
10. Holden GP. Some observations on the vibratory phenomena associated with high-speed air turbines and their transmission to living tissue. Br Dent J. 1962; 7113:265.
11. Frank RM. Reactions of dentine and pulp to drugs and restorative materials. J Dent Rest. 1975; 54:176. 12. Michelich V, Schuster GS, Pashley DH. Bacterial penetration of human dentine, in vitro. J Dent Rest.
1980; 59:1398.
13. Pashley DH, Michelich V, Kehl T. Dentine permeability: effects of smear layer removal. J Pros Dent. 1981; 46:521.
14. Brannström M. Dentine and pulp in restorative dentistry. London: Wolfe Medical Publications Ltd; 1982.
15. Swift EJ Jr, Perdigao J, Heymann HO. Bonding to enamel and dentine: a brief history and state of the art. Chicago: Quintess Int.; 1995; 26:95-110.
16. Davidson CL, Feilzer AL. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization stress in polymer-based restoratives. J Dent. 1997; 25:435-40.
17. Pashley DH. Dynamics of the pulpo-dentine complex. Crit Rev Oral Bio Med. 1996; 7:104-33.
18. Cox CF, Keall CL, Keall HJ, Ostro E, et al. Biocompatibility of surface sealed dental materials against exposed pulps. J Pros Dent. 1987; 57:1-8.
19. Hume WR. An analysis of dentine on the pulpward release of eugenol or acids from restorative materials. J Oral Rehab. 1994; 21:469-73.
20. Hume WR, Gerzia TM. Bioavailability of components of resin based materials, which are applied to teeth. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1996; 7:172-9.
21. Ferracane JL, Condon JR. Rate of elution of leachable components from composite. Dent Mater. 1990; 6:282-7.
22. Plant CG, Jones DW. The damaging effects of restorative materials. Part I: physical and chemical properties. Br Dent J. 1976; 140:373.
23. Ulusoy M, Denli N. Intrapulpal temperature changes during the setting reactions of various dental cements. Ankara Universitesi Dis Hekimligi Fakultesi Dergisi. 1990; 17(1):19-22.
24. Pameijer CH, Stanley HR, Ecker G. Biocompatibility of a glass-ionomer luting agent, crown cementation. Am J Dent. 1991; 4:134-141.
25. Murray PE, About I, Lumley PJ, Smith AJ, et al. Human odontoblast numbers after dental injury. J Dent. 2000; 28:277-285.
26. Roahen J, Marshall FJ. The effects of periodontal ligament injection on pulpal and periodontal tissues. J Endo. 1990; 16:28.
27. Torabinejad M, Peters DL, Peckham N. Electron microscopic changes in human pulps after intraligamental injection. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path. 1993; 76:219.
28. Kim S. Ligamental injection: A physiological explanation of its efficacy. J Endo. 1986; 12: 486.
29. Plamondon T, Walton R, Graham GS, Snell G, et al. Pulp response to the combined effects of cavity preparation and periodontal ligament injection. Oper Dent. 1990; 15:86.
30. D’Souza R. Pulpal and periapical immune response to electrosurgical contact with cervical metallic
restorations in monkeys. Chicago: Quintess Int.; 1986; 17:803-808.
31. Spangberg LS, Hellden L, Robertson PB, Levy BM. Pulpal effects of electrosurgery involving based and unbased cervical amalgam restorations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path. 1982; 54:678-685.
32. Krejci RF, Reinhardt RA, Wentz FM, Hardt AB, et al. Effects of electrosurgery on dog pulps under cervical metallic restorations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path. 1982; 54:575-582.
33. Cohen SC. Human pulpal response to bleaching procedures on vital teeth. J Endo. 1979; 5(5):134-138. 34. Seale NS, McIntosh JE, Taylor AN. Pulpal reaction to bleaching of teeth in dogs. J Dent Rest. 1981; 60(5):948-953.
35. Fasanaro TS. Bleaching teeth: history, chemicals and methods used for common tooth discolorations. J Dent. 1992; 25:435-440.
2. Morrant GA. Dental instrumentation and pulpal injury II - Clinical considerations. J Br Endo Soc. 1977; 10(2):55-63.
3. Stanley HR. Pulpal responses. In: Burns and Cohen S, editors. Pathways of the pulp. 3rd ed. St Louis Mosby; 1984. p. 465-489.
4. Wittrock JW, Morrant GA, Davies EH. A study of temperature changes during the removal of amalgam restoration. J Pros Dent. 1975; 13:21-35.
5. Bergenhotlz G. Evidence for bacterial causation of adverse pulpal responses in resin-based dental restorations. Crit Rev Oral Biology Med. 2000; 11: 467- 80.
6. Summitt J, editor. Fundamentals of operative dentistry – a contemporary approach. Chicago: Quintess Int.; 2001.
7. Brannström M. Communication between the oral cavity and the dental pulp associated with restorative treatment. Oper Dent. 1984; 9:57-68.
8. Fitzgerald M, Chiego DJ Jr, Heys DR. Auto- radiographic analysis of odontoblast replacement following pulp exposure in primate teeth. Arch Oral Biol. 1990; 35:707.
9. Brannström M, Linden LA, Johnson G. Movement of dentinal and pulpal fluid caused by clinical procedures. J Dent Rest. 1968; 47(5):679-82.
10. Holden GP. Some observations on the vibratory phenomena associated with high-speed air turbines and their transmission to living tissue. Br Dent J. 1962; 7113:265.
11. Frank RM. Reactions of dentine and pulp to drugs and restorative materials. J Dent Rest. 1975; 54:176. 12. Michelich V, Schuster GS, Pashley DH. Bacterial penetration of human dentine, in vitro. J Dent Rest.
1980; 59:1398.
13. Pashley DH, Michelich V, Kehl T. Dentine permeability: effects of smear layer removal. J Pros Dent. 1981; 46:521.
14. Brannström M. Dentine and pulp in restorative dentistry. London: Wolfe Medical Publications Ltd; 1982.
15. Swift EJ Jr, Perdigao J, Heymann HO. Bonding to enamel and dentine: a brief history and state of the art. Chicago: Quintess Int.; 1995; 26:95-110.
16. Davidson CL, Feilzer AL. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization stress in polymer-based restoratives. J Dent. 1997; 25:435-40.
17. Pashley DH. Dynamics of the pulpo-dentine complex. Crit Rev Oral Bio Med. 1996; 7:104-33.
18. Cox CF, Keall CL, Keall HJ, Ostro E, et al. Biocompatibility of surface sealed dental materials against exposed pulps. J Pros Dent. 1987; 57:1-8.
19. Hume WR. An analysis of dentine on the pulpward release of eugenol or acids from restorative materials. J Oral Rehab. 1994; 21:469-73.
20. Hume WR, Gerzia TM. Bioavailability of components of resin based materials, which are applied to teeth. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1996; 7:172-9.
21. Ferracane JL, Condon JR. Rate of elution of leachable components from composite. Dent Mater. 1990; 6:282-7.
22. Plant CG, Jones DW. The damaging effects of restorative materials. Part I: physical and chemical properties. Br Dent J. 1976; 140:373.
23. Ulusoy M, Denli N. Intrapulpal temperature changes during the setting reactions of various dental cements. Ankara Universitesi Dis Hekimligi Fakultesi Dergisi. 1990; 17(1):19-22.
24. Pameijer CH, Stanley HR, Ecker G. Biocompatibility of a glass-ionomer luting agent, crown cementation. Am J Dent. 1991; 4:134-141.
25. Murray PE, About I, Lumley PJ, Smith AJ, et al. Human odontoblast numbers after dental injury. J Dent. 2000; 28:277-285.
26. Roahen J, Marshall FJ. The effects of periodontal ligament injection on pulpal and periodontal tissues. J Endo. 1990; 16:28.
27. Torabinejad M, Peters DL, Peckham N. Electron microscopic changes in human pulps after intraligamental injection. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path. 1993; 76:219.
28. Kim S. Ligamental injection: A physiological explanation of its efficacy. J Endo. 1986; 12: 486.
29. Plamondon T, Walton R, Graham GS, Snell G, et al. Pulp response to the combined effects of cavity preparation and periodontal ligament injection. Oper Dent. 1990; 15:86.
30. D’Souza R. Pulpal and periapical immune response to electrosurgical contact with cervical metallic
restorations in monkeys. Chicago: Quintess Int.; 1986; 17:803-808.
31. Spangberg LS, Hellden L, Robertson PB, Levy BM. Pulpal effects of electrosurgery involving based and unbased cervical amalgam restorations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path. 1982; 54:678-685.
32. Krejci RF, Reinhardt RA, Wentz FM, Hardt AB, et al. Effects of electrosurgery on dog pulps under cervical metallic restorations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path. 1982; 54:575-582.
33. Cohen SC. Human pulpal response to bleaching procedures on vital teeth. J Endo. 1979; 5(5):134-138. 34. Seale NS, McIntosh JE, Taylor AN. Pulpal reaction to bleaching of teeth in dogs. J Dent Rest. 1981; 60(5):948-953.
35. Fasanaro TS. Bleaching teeth: history, chemicals and methods used for common tooth discolorations. J Dent. 1992; 25:435-440.
Downloads
Published
2004-01-01
How to Cite
Seeburrun, R. (2004). How might Operative Dentistry be a Threat to the Pulp?. Trinity Student Medical Journal , 5(1), Page 50–54. Retrieved from https://www.tsmj.ie/index.php/tsmj/article/view/1942
Issue
Section
Reviews
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Provided they are the owners of the copyright to their work, authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository, in a journal or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
